{"created":"2024-05-21T08:41:02.909946+00:00","id":2000005,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3d1f0915-0635-44bd-ae72-c94bf3fdb6d9"},"_deposit":{"created_by":10,"id":"2000005","owner":"10","owners":[10],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000005"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:fukuchiyama.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000005","sets":["1:47:1715911116633"]},"author_link":[],"control_number":"2000005","item_10010_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2024-03-31"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicNumberOfPages":"34","bibliographicPageEnd":"46","bibliographicPageStart":"13","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"8","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"福知山公立大学研究紀要","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10010_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿は、わが国の市町村 IO 表作成にあたって、各種ノン・サーベイ法（SLQ、CILQ、RLQ、FLQ（δ=0.3、0.25、0.05）、EMALEX 法）を用いた推計により、移輸入率にどの程度の違いが生じるのかについて、地域（市町村）規模別ならびに産業部門別に検証することを目的とした。京都府全 26 市町村を事例に検証した結果、(1)  大地域と小地域との間で、方法論の違いによる際立った差はない、(2)  製造業については、LQ 法と EMALEX 法による差異はそれほど大きくない、(3) EMALEX 法は、他の手法に比べると、他地域からの移輸入が大きいという前提に立っている、(4)  それぞれの地域で、産業特化している部門ほど乖離幅が大きい傾向にある、(5)  第三次産業ではバラつきが大きいが、地域規模や特定の産業部門に際立った特徴があるわけではない、(6) FLQ における   δ   の値を調整しても、移輸入率が 1 を超える産業部門の存在を完全に解消することはできない、という結果が得られた。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10010_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"24327662","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"三好  ゆう","creatorNameLang":"ja"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"濱田  迅","creatorNameLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2024-06-10"}],"filename":"fukuchiyama8-2.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"4.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://fukuchiyama.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000005/files/fukuchiyama8-2.pdf"},"version_id":"c18b3f5f-9b72-48d4-aa22-9b2278ca43b1"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"産業連関表","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"SLQ","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"CILQ","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"RLQ","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"FLQ","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"EMALEX","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"京都府全26市町村","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"市町村産業連関表作成における各種ノン・サーベイ法の検証 －  LQ 法と EMALEX 法の比較  －","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"市町村産業連関表作成における各種ノン・サーベイ法の検証 －  LQ 法と EMALEX 法の比較  －","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10010","owner":"10","path":["1715911116633"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2024-04-01"},"publish_date":"2024-04-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000005","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["市町村産業連関表作成における各種ノン・サーベイ法の検証 －  LQ 法と EMALEX 法の比較  －"],"weko_creator_id":"10","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-06-10T02:24:41.697325+00:00"}